Abstract New Breeding Techniques (NBTs), such as CRISPR-Cas9, TALENs, and ODM, are reshaping the way we develop plant-based products for food and cosmetic applications by allowing for more precise and efficient trait improvements. However, despite their scientific potential, global acceptance and regulation of NBT-derived products continue to vary widely. This study provides a comparative analysis of public perceptions across six countries—Spain, France, China, Japan, Brazil, and the United States—focusing on consumer attitudes toward NBT use in food and skincare products. Based on survey data from 724 participants, we found clear regional differences in familiarity, risk perception, and acceptance of NBTs. Participants from China and Japan showed relatively higher awareness and openness toward these technologies. In contrast, respondents from Spain and France were more skeptical, especially when it came to environmental risks. In Brazil, opinions were more evenly split, reflecting ongoing national discussions. Despite the U.S. having a product-based regulatory framework, trust in NBT safety and willingness to consume NBT-derived goods was notably low. One of the most consistent findings was strong support for mandatory labeling across all countries, signaling a shared expectation for transparency. Claims framing NBT products as “green” or sustainable received limited agreement, particularly in Western countries. Statistical analyses confirmed significant differences in national response patterns, although average acceptance scores did not vary significantly. These results point to the importance of considering social and cultural context in the development and communication of NBT innovations. While awareness is gradually increasing, broader adoption will depend on transparent regulation, locally adapted communication strategies, and genuine public engagement. Building trust through clear, evidence-based messaging—and respecting regional values and concerns—will be essential to ensuring responsible and widely accepted use of genome-edited technologies.
Date: | 2025-04-21 |
---|
Authors: | Medina TR. |
---|
Ref: | Research Square |
---|